Post by Purebred Redneck on Dec 16, 2008 16:52:03 GMT -5
In 2007, we had 3 "posting wars" where the winner was the member with the most posts for the month. In ways it was good to have. I think in other ways it could have been improved on.
So in 2008 we had (have) the "MVP" contest. Myself and KLSM54 would get together at the end of the month and pick the 3 most valuable posters. This addressed the issue of posting just to post. As scott can verify, just because you had the most posts - it doesn't mean anything.
Remember at the end of the year we will have a drawing and anyone who recieved a point all year is in on it. At the moment, that number is 10 members
So I think that helped address the issue of recognizing as many people as we can.
I think this is a fair contest - as fair as a contest is going to get. I think we will have this again next year.
Is there something that we can change to make it better though?
So in 2008 we had (have) the "MVP" contest. Myself and KLSM54 would get together at the end of the month and pick the 3 most valuable posters. This addressed the issue of posting just to post. As scott can verify, just because you had the most posts - it doesn't mean anything.
Remember at the end of the year we will have a drawing and anyone who recieved a point all year is in on it. At the moment, that number is 10 members
So I think that helped address the issue of recognizing as many people as we can.
I think this is a fair contest - as fair as a contest is going to get. I think we will have this again next year.
Is there something that we can change to make it better though?
