Theorems Applying To Wild Game Cookery

[deputydon]

Theorems applying to wild game cookery

No new recipe is ever a total failure; it can always serve as a bad example.
You can’t prepare a wild game meal if you didn’t bag any wild game.
Culinary expertise is inversely proportional to kitchens ruined and meals burned. (That one was for 2M’s)
If anything can go wrong, check the oven because it may have already.
When you return from the store and begin to prepare a wild game recipe, there will always be one ingredient you forgot to buy.
According to your hunting buddies, there is always an ingredient which, when added to or subtracted from your recipe, will provide a better tasting meal.
If the recipe works perfectly this time, you won’t be able to remember what you did right for the next time.
Having the butcher drop meat into the bag you are holding does not justify telling your dinner guests that you “bagged” this meal.
Too many theorems turn wild game cookery into wild kookery (again for 2M’s)
When all else fails, reread the recipe.
When rereading the recipe fails, blame it on a printing error.

[klsm54]

;D ;D ;D Theorems??? I thought when I finished Geometry, back in high school, I'd never hear that term again. Since your theorems seem to very true, there are probably underlying postulates that would also apply to the cooking of wild game... ;D ;D

[Jack]

Postulates??? Yuuccckkkk!
That doesn't sound like something I want to cook!

[Purebred Redneck]

Sounds more like a place I've been known to visit

[Jack]

LOl, Red.
Or something that shows up on duck breasts....
Or something that shows up a week or so after ya visit one of those places, Red.